Digital Commons @ Colby - CLAS: Colby Liberal Arts Symposium: Should We Write Our Own Questions? The Effects of Multiple Choice Question Generation on Test Performance
 

Event Title

Should We Write Our Own Questions? The Effects of Multiple Choice Question Generation on Test Performance

Presenter Information

Shanna Grant, Colby CollegeFollow

Location

Parker-Reed, SSWAC

Start Date

1-5-2014 2:00 PM

End Date

1-5-2014 3:00 PM

Project Type

Poster- Restricted to Campus Access

Description

Students often feel that re-reading course material is an effective way to study; however, studies have shown that studying by taking a practice test is more beneficial than simply re-reading. This notion that studying by taking a test greatly increases ones performance on a later assessment is called the testing effect (Roediger & Karpicke, 2006). Building on this finding, Weinstein, McDermott, and Roediger (2010) investigated the benefits that creating an exam can have on later retention. Participants re-read, took a test on, and created short-answer questions about passages, and the results showed a positive effect of generating such questions on later test performance. Due to the abundance of multiple-choice questions in educational settings, it is important to examine the impact of generating such questions on test performance. Some studies (e.g., Kang, McDermott, & Roediger, 2007), found that the testing effect is reduced when a multiple choice test is given compared to short answer test; others, however, have found no difference (Smith & Karpicke, 2013). Thus, this project investigates the benefits of creating multiple choice questions as a study strategy compared to taking a multiple choice exam or re-reading class material.

Sponsoring Department

Colby College. Psychology Dept.

CLAS Field of Study

Social Sciences

Event Website

http://www.colby.edu/clas

ID

139

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
May 1st, 2:00 PM May 1st, 3:00 PM

Should We Write Our Own Questions? The Effects of Multiple Choice Question Generation on Test Performance

Parker-Reed, SSWAC

Students often feel that re-reading course material is an effective way to study; however, studies have shown that studying by taking a practice test is more beneficial than simply re-reading. This notion that studying by taking a test greatly increases ones performance on a later assessment is called the testing effect (Roediger & Karpicke, 2006). Building on this finding, Weinstein, McDermott, and Roediger (2010) investigated the benefits that creating an exam can have on later retention. Participants re-read, took a test on, and created short-answer questions about passages, and the results showed a positive effect of generating such questions on later test performance. Due to the abundance of multiple-choice questions in educational settings, it is important to examine the impact of generating such questions on test performance. Some studies (e.g., Kang, McDermott, & Roediger, 2007), found that the testing effect is reduced when a multiple choice test is given compared to short answer test; others, however, have found no difference (Smith & Karpicke, 2013). Thus, this project investigates the benefits of creating multiple choice questions as a study strategy compared to taking a multiple choice exam or re-reading class material.

https://digitalcommons.colby.edu/clas/2014/program/379