Date of Award
Honors Thesis (Open Access)
Colby College. Psychology Dept.
Thane S. Pittman
In their theory of self-verification, Swann and Read’s (1981) postulate that people like feedback that is consistent with their self-concept. Researchers have yet to examine what happens when two individuals are both seeking feedback from each other to verify their self-concept on the same domain. When individuals are competing against someone to verify a similarly held self-concept, they should try to seek more polarized feedback, especially when the domain is highly important. In two experiments, participants expected to receive computer feedback on their responses to identity-related questions, either based on their own responses or on how they compared to the other participants. In Experiment 1, participants who were competing on a domain of high importance sought more positive feedback, and sought more neutral feedback on a domain of low importance. Experiment 2, in which participants evaluated domains of negative self-concept, failed to yield any significant results. The evidence of extreme feedback-seeking on positive, important domains when competing for identity has important implications for detrimental identity-confirming processes in clinical populations that may inhibit recovery. Overall, this highlights the importance of considering the self-verification processes of both partners in an interaction.
self-verification, identity, self-concept, competition, interpersonal interaction
Recommended CitationWesnousky, Alexandra E., "No, I’m really, really bad at math: Competition for self-verification" (2010). Honors Theses. Paper 579.
Colby College theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed or downloaded from this site for the purposes of research and scholarship. Reproduction or distribution for commercial purposes is prohibited without written permission of the author.