Competition or Community? Manifest and Unexpressed Functions of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001
Date of Award
Honors Thesis (Open Access)
Colby College. Sociology Dept.
Thomas J. Morrione
Any contemporary discussion of the American education system inevitably includes a discussion of current federal policy as set out in The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB). Signed into law on January 8, 2002, NCLB has sparked tremendous controversy in the field of education. Although the title would suggest otherwise, NCLB does not aim to make sure no child is left behind. Instead, one might argue that it aims to provide quantifiable measures of comparison so as to allow the U.S. to assert educational and economic dominance in the global community. Thus, we can see a distinction between the manifest, or publicly stated, and unexpressed functions in the bill. While the stated goal of NCLB is to provide all children with a quality education, the unspoken intention of this policy, I believe, is to assert America’s place as the economic superpower in the global economy.
No Child Left Behind, Act of 2001 Educational change, United States Educational accountability -- United States Education
Recommended CitationBenjamin, Sara, "Competition or Community? Manifest and Unexpressed Functions of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001" (2008). Honors Theses. Paper 288.
Colby College theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed or downloaded from this site for the purposes of research and scholarship. Reproduction or distribution for commercial purposes is prohibited without written permission of the author.