Date of Award

2025

Document Type

Honors Thesis (Open Access)

Department

Colby College. Government Dept.

Advisor(s)

Professor Dan Shea

Second Advisor

Professor Nicholas Jacobs

Abstract

In an age of heightened polarization and increasing incivility in politics, a small but influential subset of Americans, known as the deeply engaged have emerged as dominant voices in political dialogue. This thesis investigates who these individuals are, what drives them, and how their behavior impacts democratic participation in the United States. Through a combination of theoretical analysis and original survey data, this study constructs a profile of the deeply engaged and distinguishes them from the general electorate. Drawing on foundational concepts of free speech, including isegoria and parrhesia, and the philosophies of John Stuart Mill and Karl Popper, this work situates the deeply engaged within broader historical and ethical frameworks. Empirical findings suggest that these individuals are typically younger, more educated, Democrat, and more likely to be male and financially secure. They are characterized by high levels of media consumption, frequent public political expression, and a confrontational rhetorical style. Their understanding of free speech often aligns more with parrhesia, which values unrestrained expression even if it means others are unable to share their own views. Their deep engagement can strengthen democracy, but it can also hinder fair debate and social unity. This thesis argues that the deeply engaged differ from other Americans and wield disproportionate influence over public narratives and political culture – an influence that may undermine the egalitarian ideals central to American democracy.

Keywords

deeply engaged, political discourse, polarization, freedom of speech, media, political expression

Download

Share

COinS